This is my first video camera and I am a geek so please pardon me if I get a little technical as I’m the kind of guy who shops simply by comparing specs.
Before this, my only experience with video cameras where those that I borrowed from friends and family over the years to cover the occasional family event – I prefer shooting with a still camera. I have been shooting with SLR’s for the past 25 years (all Nikons from the FM2 to the D3) so I am biased towards prints presentation and web sharing. This makes me a johnny-come-lately into the camcorder world.
2008 saw the confluence of our first HDTV, Canon’s release of an affordable true HD-resolution camcorder, and cheap flash-memory storage. So it finally hit me that *right now* is the time to get into recording life’s sweet moments on “tape.” (And at 16:9 1920×1080 resolution at that! I’m a geek remember?)
I live in a developing country in Asia where new gizmos are always late to market and priced 30-50% more so the only way to find what I want is to shop online by specs. I’ve compared and read every user review of all the available models from Sony, JVC, Panasonic, and Canon and the recently-announced and released HF100 sure got everything right on paper! I received my Amazon package 2 days ago and I’m happy to report that this little gem is EXACTLY what I wanted and expected!
These are what I was looking for and which, happily, I got:
1. Flash-memory based recording on SD
I can’t deal with tape nor am I comfortable with a spinning drive inside a piece of equipment that I might drop. Sony’s Memory Sticks don’t fit my world and with Transcend Class 6 16Gb SD cards priced at only $74, the HF100 is perfect for my workflow! (I spend 10-16hrs a day in front of a PC.)
I’ve decided to shoot all my material using FX mode and a 16Gb card is good for 2hours worth of video. (Side note: the standard BP809 battery is good for only about 1hr so you better get an extra one.)
2. True HD quality
I still have to get myself a HDMI cable but the component-out signal on my LCD is crisp and more than what I expected! To my eye, it’s as good as the prosumer-level models that I’ve been wanting to get but can’t justify.
3. Fast focus
The focusing works darn well. It’s not 100% but it’s very close. And this is from a guy who’s spoiled by the fast- and multi-point focusing of pro-level DSLR’s and lenses.
4. OIS
Generally works, you gotta give it a half-second or so to stabilize and the LCD viewfinder is a great way to balance the unit with 2 hands. Once you zoom all the way to 12x though, I recommend using a tripod esp when shooting for long periods of time (like stage performances).
5. Output files
The files are saved in MTS format and after Googling for half an hour, I was able to download a couple of freeware transcoders and converted a 46-second 89Mb 1920×1080 clip and downsized it into a 16Mb 848×480 XVid AVI which is gentler on my Mediagate MG-350 hard disk media player. I intend to archive all originals on BluRay and downsample the files to make it easier to share, think YouTube, Windows Media Player, hard disk media players, iPhones, etc…
6. Size and build
Yep, it’s really the size of soda can and very, very insconspicuous. It has metallic gun metal finish and, although not as aesthetically pleasing as the black HF10, it’s better-looking than the pics on the web. The size is a welcome change from the routine harassment I get from overzealous mall security who thinks I’m out to make a quick buck selling pictures of mall scenes and/or architecture everytime I fish out my so-called ‘professional’ DSLR. I shot all day today and no one even noticed. The build is perfect, like what we’re used to expect from high-quality, super-miniaturized products from Japan. For what it’s worth, the unit I got is labeled Made in Japan.
7. User interface
I haven’t read the manual yet as the basic camcorder stuff is easy. But I concur with the observation that the START/STOP and CAMERA/VIDEO RECORD/PLAYBACK switches could have been designed better. I prefer the Sony approach where a rotating collar representing the different modes rings a big round red button. The on-screen menu can be better but it’s liveable. I’m so used to the intuitive interface of Nikon cameras so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that (just) some of the quirkiness of Canon’s camera interface design can also be found on their camcorders. For example, there are way too many clicks to get a clip deleted. I also wish that scrolling through the clips is fast as browsing through a digicam’s thumbnails.
8. Optics
Based on what I see on the LCD TV, they’re great! I’m a wide-angle shooter so my next purchase is a 0.5x wide angle converter, but I’m now hesitating against buying the $50 models as they may not do justice to the camcorder outstanding optics. Information on photographic lens quality such as resolving power, MTF charts, etc.. are readily available online but there seems to be less on video-related optics so I gotta spend some time finding the right one for this.
9. Control layout
I think the layout is okay. The AV jack, HDMI jack, and composite jacks are on 3 separate sides, I hope they can put them all on one side in the next iteration. Oh, the tactile feel, location and size of the photo capture button is awkward. Coming from a DSLR, how I use/misuse this button often results in blurred pictures esp when in dim light. There’s just no way of releasing the shutter without causing camera shake. But then again, why use a camcorder as a camera? 
10. Audio
I think the audio recording is okay, it records my narrative clearly. I haven’t shoot enough to judge how audio from the subject sounds like but I will attend a beach wedding in a couple of weeks, so I’ll report back on how the wind filter and audio pickup performs in such an environment.
I’m truly happy with this purchase. After 2 days with it and experimenting on post-production workflow, I’d rate this product a 10/10.
Get one!
—
2008.05.01 Update
Start up time from stand-by is 1sec. Start up time from dead cold is 6 seconds regardless of your flash capacity (I tried it on 1, 4, and 16Gb) and regardless of how many clips are already in it.
Finalists on my list before I got the HF100 are the Sony HDR-CX7 and the Panny SD9. They’re worth taking a look and the reviews should tell you why I chose the HF100 instead.
I’ve just finalized my AVCHD to DVD workflow and it basically involves transcoding from MTS > AVC (Using DGAVCIndex) > MPEG2/DVD (Using ConvertXToDVD & AVISynth). I don’t have a Blu-Ray player yet so I’ll figure out that workflow some other time. Checkout http://www.videohelp.com for all the tips and tricks you’ll ever need.
I think my DSLR’s will see a lot less action in as far as shooting family is concerned. 
—
2008.05.03 Update
For easy 1-step conversion of AVCHD files to DVD discs, one probably has to use commercial software such as iMovie, Nero 8, ULead 11, etc…
The geek in me was somehow drawn to open source/freeware software I found via the http://www.VideoHelp.com forum, specifically as illustrated in this thread – http://forum.videohelp.com/topic346331.html.
I learned (over the past few days) that AVCHD recording saves your material as an MTS file which you’ll find in the STREAMS subdirectory. MTS files combine the actual AVC video (MPEG4/H264 format) and AC3 audio into a single ‘stream.’ As such, you need to demultiplex or split up the streams into their individual video and audio components before you can get any transcoding done (conversion from one format to another).
To demux the MTS file, I used a software called DGAVCIndex (downloadable via a link in the above thread) and a utility called AVISynth which acts as a frameserver or translator to a final software that creates your final output. The final software I chose to use are VirtualDub for creating DivX- or XVid-encoded AVI files which you can view on your PC. On the other hand, I use ConvertXtoDVD to create DVD discs that I can view on any DVD player out there.
Yeah, that made my head spin too!
Anyways, that’s DGAVCINDEX to split, if you don’t split you won’t get anything done. AVISYNTH to act as a pre-processor for the split files – add fade-in/out, resize, sharpen, adjust color, etc… CONVERTXDVD takes that pre-processed files and convert/burn the output directly to DVD.
Those are all freeware but the commercial stuff aren’t too expensive either. I just hope that the little explanation helps you better understand/appreciate the conversion process. I heard that it wasn’t this easy dealing with AVCHD files as late as a year ago.
Happy shooting!
Rating: 5 / 5
This is my first video camera and I am a geek so please pardon me if I get a little technical as I’m the kind of guy who shops simply by comparing specs.
Before this, my only experience with video cameras where those that I borrowed from friends and family over the years to cover the occasional family event – I prefer shooting with a still camera. I have been shooting with SLR’s for the past 25 years (all Nikons from the FM2 to the D3) so I am biased towards prints presentation and web sharing. This makes me a johnny-come-lately into the camcorder world.
2008 saw the confluence of our first HDTV, Canon’s release of an affordable true HD-resolution camcorder, and cheap flash-memory storage. So it finally hit me that *right now* is the time to get into recording life’s sweet moments on “tape.” (And at 16:9 1920×1080 resolution at that! I’m a geek remember?)
I live in a developing country in Asia where new gizmos are always late to market and priced 30-50% more so the only way to find what I want is to shop online by specs. I’ve compared and read every user review of all the available models from Sony, JVC, Panasonic, and Canon and the recently-announced and released HF100 sure got everything right on paper! I received my Amazon package 2 days ago and I’m happy to report that this little gem is EXACTLY what I wanted and expected!
These are what I was looking for and which, happily, I got:
1. Flash-memory based recording on SD
I can’t deal with tape nor am I comfortable with a spinning drive inside a piece of equipment that I might drop. Sony’s Memory Sticks don’t fit my world and with Transcend Class 6 16Gb SD cards priced at only $74, the HF100 is perfect for my workflow! (I spend 10-16hrs a day in front of a PC.)
I’ve decided to shoot all my material using FX mode and a 16Gb card is good for 2hours worth of video. (Side note: the standard BP809 battery is good for only about 1hr so you better get an extra one.)
2. True HD quality
I still have to get myself a HDMI cable but the component-out signal on my LCD is crisp and more than what I expected! To my eye, it’s as good as the prosumer-level models that I’ve been wanting to get but can’t justify.
3. Fast focus
The focusing works darn well. It’s not 100% but it’s very close. And this is from a guy who’s spoiled by the fast- and multi-point focusing of pro-level DSLR’s and lenses.
4. OIS
Generally works, you gotta give it a half-second or so to stabilize and the LCD viewfinder is a great way to balance the unit with 2 hands. Once you zoom all the way to 12x though, I recommend using a tripod esp when shooting for long periods of time (like stage performances).
5. Output files
The files are saved in MTS format and after Googling for half an hour, I was able to download a couple of freeware transcoders and converted a 46-second 89Mb 1920×1080 clip and downsized it into a 16Mb 848×480 XVid AVI which is gentler on my Mediagate MG-350 hard disk media player. I intend to archive all originals on BluRay and downsample the files to make it easier to share, think YouTube, Windows Media Player, hard disk media players, iPhones, etc…
6. Size and build
Yep, it’s really the size of soda can and very, very insconspicuous. It has metallic gun metal finish and, although not as aesthetically pleasing as the black HF10, it’s better-looking than the pics on the web. The size is a welcome change from the routine harassment I get from overzealous mall security who thinks I’m out to make a quick buck selling pictures of mall scenes and/or architecture everytime I fish out my so-called ‘professional’ DSLR. I shot all day today and no one even noticed. The build is perfect, like what we’re used to expect from high-quality, super-miniaturized products from Japan. For what it’s worth, the unit I got is labeled Made in Japan.
7. User interface
I haven’t read the manual yet as the basic camcorder stuff is easy. But I concur with the observation that the START/STOP and CAMERA/VIDEO RECORD/PLAYBACK switches could have been designed better. I prefer the Sony approach where a rotating collar representing the different modes rings a big round red button. The on-screen menu can be better but it’s liveable. I’m so used to the intuitive interface of Nikon cameras so I guess I shouldn’t be surprised that (just) some of the quirkiness of Canon’s camera interface design can also be found on their camcorders. For example, there are way too many clicks to get a clip deleted. I also wish that scrolling through the clips is fast as browsing through a digicam’s thumbnails.
8. Optics
Based on what I see on the LCD TV, they’re great! I’m a wide-angle shooter so my next purchase is a 0.5x wide angle converter, but I’m now hesitating against buying the $50 models as they may not do justice to the camcorder outstanding optics. Information on photographic lens quality such as resolving power, MTF charts, etc.. are readily available online but there seems to be less on video-related optics so I gotta spend some time finding the right one for this.
9. Control layout
I think the layout is okay. The AV jack, HDMI jack, and composite jacks are on 3 separate sides, I hope they can put them all on one side in the next iteration. Oh, the tactile feel, location and size of the photo capture button is awkward. Coming from a DSLR, how I use/misuse this button often results in blurred pictures esp when in dim light. There’s just no way of releasing the shutter without causing camera shake. But then again, why use a camcorder as a camera?
10. Audio
I think the audio recording is okay, it records my narrative clearly. I haven’t shoot enough to judge how audio from the subject sounds like but I will attend a beach wedding in a couple of weeks, so I’ll report back on how the wind filter and audio pickup performs in such an environment.
I’m truly happy with this purchase. After 2 days with it and experimenting on post-production workflow, I’d rate this product a 10/10.
Get one!
—
2008.05.01 Update
Start up time from stand-by is 1sec. Start up time from dead cold is 6 seconds regardless of your flash capacity (I tried it on 1, 4, and 16Gb) and regardless of how many clips are already in it.
Finalists on my list before I got the HF100 are the Sony HDR-CX7 and the Panny SD9. They’re worth taking a look and the reviews should tell you why I chose the HF100 instead.
I’ve just finalized my AVCHD to DVD workflow and it basically involves transcoding from MTS > AVC (Using DGAVCIndex) > MPEG2/DVD (Using ConvertXToDVD & AVISynth). I don’t have a Blu-Ray player yet so I’ll figure out that workflow some other time. Checkout http://www.videohelp.com for all the tips and tricks you’ll ever need.
I think my DSLR’s will see a lot less action in as far as shooting family is concerned.
—
2008.05.03 Update
For easy 1-step conversion of AVCHD files to DVD discs, one probably has to use commercial software such as iMovie, Nero 8, ULead 11, etc…
The geek in me was somehow drawn to open source/freeware software I found via the http://www.VideoHelp.com forum, specifically as illustrated in this thread – http://forum.videohelp.com/topic346331.html.
I learned (over the past few days) that AVCHD recording saves your material as an MTS file which you’ll find in the STREAMS subdirectory. MTS files combine the actual AVC video (MPEG4/H264 format) and AC3 audio into a single ‘stream.’ As such, you need to demultiplex or split up the streams into their individual video and audio components before you can get any transcoding done (conversion from one format to another).
To demux the MTS file, I used a software called DGAVCIndex (downloadable via a link in the above thread) and a utility called AVISynth which acts as a frameserver or translator to a final software that creates your final output. The final software I chose to use are VirtualDub for creating DivX- or XVid-encoded AVI files which you can view on your PC. On the other hand, I use ConvertXtoDVD to create DVD discs that I can view on any DVD player out there.
Yeah, that made my head spin too!
Anyways, that’s DGAVCINDEX to split, if you don’t split you won’t get anything done. AVISYNTH to act as a pre-processor for the split files – add fade-in/out, resize, sharpen, adjust color, etc… CONVERTXDVD takes that pre-processed files and convert/burn the output directly to DVD.
Those are all freeware but the commercial stuff aren’t too expensive either. I just hope that the little explanation helps you better understand/appreciate the conversion process. I heard that it wasn’t this easy dealing with AVCHD files as late as a year ago.
Happy shooting!
Rating: 5 / 5